Internet Stroke Center Home Stroke Trials Registry
 
National Institute of Neurological Disorders & Stroke
American Stroke Association
Washington University School of Medicine
 
 Trials Directories
Ongoing Trials
Completed Trials
Acute Stroke Trials
Hemorrhage Trials
Prevention Trials
Recovery Trials
 Interventions
Drugs - By Name
Drugs - By Category
Procedures
Recovery Therapies
 Assessment Scales
Specific Stroke Scales
Stroke Scales Overview
 Stroke Trial Links
Government Sites
Independent Sites
 News & Updates
Update List
General Stroke News
About this Site
Submit Your Trial
Send Feedback

 Search for Trials

PubMed
We comply with the "Health on the Net" (HON) code of standards for trustworthy health information: verify here.



 
Stroke Interventions in Clinical Trials
Printable Version
CREST
Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stent Trial



Principal Investigator
Thomas G. Brott, M.D.

PI Address
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ-NJMS)
30 Bergen Street
ADMC 617
Newark, NJ 07101-1709

Contact Address
Mary Longbottom, CCRP
CREST Director for Data Quality
Mayo Clinic Florida
PH: 904-953-7742
FX: 904-953-0277

Contact Email
Longbottom.Mary@mayo.edu

Sponsor



Trial Phase:Phase III
Study Size Actual:2522
Study Size Planned:2500
Centers Actual:118
Max Time from onset:180 Days
Follow-up Duration:10 Years
ISRCTN#NCT00004732
Status:
CREST is ongoing, but not recruiting participants. Use of CTA or MRA was approved by NIH and FDA for confirmation of randomization stenosis. The lead-in phase has been closed. Recruitment in the randomized phase was completed July 18, 2008 with 2522 total patient randomizations (1326 symptomatic and 1196 asymptomatic) at 118 U.S. and Canadian sites, CREST is the largest enrolling trial to address the efficacy of CAS versus CEA. Follow-up is ongoing.

Purpose:
To compare the efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in preventing stroke, myocardial infarction or mortality in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis.

Interventions:
Endarterectomy, carotid
Surgical therapy to remove atherosclerotic plaque in narrowed carotid arteries.
Stent, carotid
Intravascular procedure to maintain carotid artery patency

Location(s):
Several US states and Canadian provinces.

Year Started: 2000
Year Presented: 2009

Design:
Prospective, randomized, parallel, two-arm, multi-center clinical trial with blinded endpoint evaluation.

Inclusion Criteria
Patients who have experienced a transient ischemic attack (TIA), amaurosis fugax (AF), or non-disabling stroke within the past 180 days, and who have an ipsilateral carotid stenosis >=50% by angiography or >=70% by ultrasound or >= 70% by CTA or MRA are eligible for this study.
Asymptomatic subjects:
Patients who have carotid stenosis >=60% by angiography or >=70% by ultrasound or >= 80% by CTA or MRA are eligible for this study. (Subjects with symptoms beyond 180 days are considered asymptomatic).

Exclusion Criteria
Patients who have comorbid conditions that interfere with the evaluation of endpoints, that are known to interfere with the completion of CEA or CAS, or that affect the likelihood of survival for the 4-year study period, will be excluded from this study.

Patient Involvement:
Eligible patients will be randomized to undergo either CAS or CEA. All will receive aspirin antiplatelet therapy, treatment for hypertension, and management of other stroke risk factors. Follow-up will last four years, including clinic visits at 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48 months.

Primary Outcome:
Mortality, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 30 days postoperatively; ipsilateral stroke at 30 days post-operatively.

Results:
Of 429 stent operators who applied, 225 (52%) were approved for randomization. Initially, 117 applicants did not meet criteria to advance; the number of cases evaluated ranged from 1 to 56, median 12. The IMC judged that 70 operators of the 429 had sufficient experience, and sufficient experience with the study devices (range: 7–81), to be exempt from the lead-in. A total of 242 applicants met the criteria for the lead-in phase; the number of cases submitted by this group ranged from 3 to 63, median 29. Forty-four did not meet the regulatory and training requirements, moved to another institution or were from an institution that was not CREST-approved. The remaining 198 were approved by the IMC to enroll in the lead-in phase and are board certified (or the Canadian equivalent) in cardiology (40%), vascular surgery (21%), neuroradiology (15%), interventional radiology (15%), neurosurgery (8%) and neurology (2%). Of these 198 operators, 160, completing an average of 9 (range: 1–35) cases, were approved for randomization; the remaining 38 did not do the required number of cases before trial
enrollment ended. Of the 70 lead-in exempt, IMC-approved experienced operators, four were unable to meet the regulatory or training requirements, and one was from an unapproved site. A total of 225 operators at 122 sites were therefore qualified in the Interventional/CAS arm of CREST.
In conclusion, previous RCTs comparing CAS and CEA have been criticized for sub-optimal credentialing and training of
stent operators. The CREST credentialing and training process is the most rigorous reported to date and
may serve as a model for future trials.

Source of Information:
Clinicaltrials.gov.
Correspondence with trial coordinator.
Stroke 33:646, 2002.
Presented at the 30th International Stroke Conference [February 2005].
Presented at the 2006 International Stroke Conference [February 2006].
Presented at the 2007 International Stroke Conference [February 2007].
Presented at the 2008 International Stroke Conference [February 2008].
Presented at the 2009 International Stroke Conference [February 2009].

Web Links and Publications:
CREST Trial Web Site

CREST
ClinicalTrials.gov

Does sex matter? Thirty-day stroke and death rates after carotid artery stenting in women versus men: results from the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) lead-in phase.
Stroke 2009 Apr;40(4):1140-7

Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: current status.
Neurosurg Clin N Am 2008 Jul;19(3):447-58, vi

Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase.
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Dec;40(6):1106-11.

CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial): background, design, and current status.
Semin Vasc Surg. 2000 Jun;13(2):139-43.

This information last updated on: 8/26/2009

Reviewed on: 08/26/2009.

UID: 80

   

Internet Stroke Center at Washington University:
HOME | ABOUT | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT

Copyright © 1997-2009 - Internet Stroke Center. All rights reserved.                                           Last modified: Friday, November 20, 2009