Internet Stroke Center Home Stroke Education for Clinicians & Students
 

Patients & Families   Health Professionals   Clinical Trials   About   Home 

 Stroke Education
Section Home
Glossary of
Neurological Terms

 Stroke Management
Thrombolytic Case Management Series
CT Learning Tool
Evaluation & Diagnosis
Stroke Care for EMT's & Paramedics
Management of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy
 Brain Anatomy
Anatomy of the Brain
Blood Vessels of the Brain
Pathogenesis & Pathophysiology
 Brain Imaging
Neurology Image Library
CT & MRI Criteria for Infarction & Hemorrhage
Guide to Imaging Techniques
MRI Compared to CT
 Stroke Facts
Epidemiology of Stroke
Stroke Risk Factors
Types of Stroke

 Search

Search the ISC 
Search the Web


Stroke in Perspective: Types of Stroke

Stroke Survival by Subtype III

Focus on Lacunar Infarction

Focus on Lacunar Infarction

Data from a number of studies indicate relatively high short- and long-term survival rates for patients with lacunar stroke as compared with other stroke subtypes.  Lacunar infarction has been defined by Bamford et al as a stroke associated with one of four recognized lacunar syndromes in which CT or autopsy data are compatible with cerebral infarction due to primary disease of a single perforating artery of the brain. [Bamford J, et al. Stroke. 1987;18:545].  The four recognized syndromes included pure motor stroke, pure sensory stroke, pure sensory stroke, sensorimotor stroke, and ataxic hemiparesis.  In some studies, miscellaneous other syndromes are included in the definition [Brainin M, et al. Neuroepidemiology. 1992;11:190.  Clavier I, et al. Stroke. 1994;25:2005].

Although there is general agreement that patients with lacunar infarction are more likely to survive their stroke than those with other stroke subtypes, the reported incidence of functional dependence among survivors varies from one study to another.  In an Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) series of 515 first-ever strokes, of which 102 were classified as lacunar infarction, it was found that before the occurrence of lacunar infarction, approximately 80% of the patients were capable of independent existence (the scale was not described), compared with 67% of patients surviving at least 1 month and 66% of those surviving at  least 1  year [Bamford J, et al. Stroke. 1987;18:545].  Thus, approximately one-third of survivors were dependent to some extent on other persons at 1 year; the investigators noted that this is a proportion similar to survivors of other types of stroke in the OCSP experience and emphasized that lacunar infarcts occur in "strategically important areas."

In a study from France, 74% of 178 patients with a diagnosis of lacunar infarction had mild or no disability at 1 year or more based on the Barthel Index [Clavier I, et al. Stroke. 1994;25:2005]; this is consistent with a study by Arboix et al, which reported mild or no neurologic disability in approximately 78% of 227 patients with lacunar infarcts [Arboix A, et al. Stroke. 1990;21:842].  Eight percent of patients in the Clavier et al study required minor help in their daily lives (Barthel Index < 95), and 18% needed considerable help (Barthel Index < 85).  The main independent predictors of disability were age, diabetes, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, and type of lacunar syndrome.  In the latter regard, patients with motor deficits (i.e., sensorimotor strokes, pure motor hemiparesis) had the worst functional prognosis, whereas patient ataxic hemiparesis or other lacunar syndromes recovered almost completely; similar findings were previously reported by Gandolfo et al [Gandolfo C, et al. Acta Neurol Scand. 1986;74:224].

Back

Contents

Next

From: Acute Ischemic Stroke: New Concepts of Care
© 1998-1999 Genentech Inc. All rights reserved.
Click here for information about this CD.

 

 

This site is a non-profit, educational service of Washington University School of MedicineInternet Stroke Center at Washington University:
TOP | HOME | ABOUT | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT

Copyright © 1997 - 2007 Internet Stroke Center. All rights reserved.

The information in this web site is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment.
Consultation with your doctor or health care professional is recommended.