Internet Stroke Center Home Stroke Education for Clinicians & Students
 

Patients & Families   Health Professionals   Clinical Trials   About   Home 

 Stroke Education
Section Home
Glossary of
Neurological Terms

 Stroke Management
Thrombolytic Case Management Series
CT Learning Tool
Evaluation & Diagnosis
Stroke Care for EMT's & Paramedics
Management of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy
 Brain Anatomy
Anatomy of the Brain
Blood Vessels of the Brain
Pathogenesis & Pathophysiology
 Brain Imaging
Neurology Image Library
CT & MRI Criteria for Infarction & Hemorrhage
Guide to Imaging Techniques
MRI Compared to CT
 Stroke Facts
Epidemiology of Stroke
Stroke Risk Factors
Types of Stroke

 Search

Search the ISC 
Search the Web


Stroke in Perspective: Types of Stroke

Improvement in Stroke Survival by Subtype II During the 1980s:

Minnesota Stroke Survey

Minnesota Stroke Survey

The Minnesota Stroke Survey (MSS) was undertaken to determine whether survival of hospitalized stroke patients had changed during the 1980s.  Each of three period cohorts (1980, 1985, 1990), totaling 1853 patients, was followed for at least 2 years for a primary end point of all-cause mortality.

An improved survival rate over the 10-year span was evident in the short term (28 days) as well as for patients who survived longer.  Based on either MSS or World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for stroke, the age-adjusted odds of death within 2 years after the even were approximately 40% lower in 1990 than in 1980.

Trend analysis by stroke subtype indicated that most of the improved survival was attributable to improved odds of surviving an ischemic stroke, primarily among patients with no apparent cardioembolic source.  Based on MSS stroke criteria, the relative odds of 2-year death in 1990 (versus 1980) were 0.42 for thrombotic stroke, 0.78 for possibly embolic stroke, and 0.42 for stroke of underdetermined type.  There was no evidence of improved survival over time for patients with hemorrhagic stroke.

The investigators suggested two possible explanations for the observed improvements.  One was better supportive and rehabilitative care (eg, improved management and/or prevention of sequelae such as pulmonary embolism or bronchopneumonia or of coexisting cardiac disease).  A second potential explanation was a change in the natural history of stroke, with stroke becoming a less severe disease; the investigators suggested, for example, that improved levels of cardiovascular disease risk factors, although primarily thought to decrease stroke incidence, may have resulted in better prognosis for those suffering a stroke.

Back

Contents

Next

From: Acute Ischemic Stroke: New Concepts of Care
© 1998-1999 Genentech Inc. All rights reserved.
Click here for information about this CD.

 

 

This site is a non-profit, educational service of Washington University School of MedicineInternet Stroke Center at Washington University:
TOP | HOME | ABOUT | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT

Copyright © 1997 - 2007 Internet Stroke Center. All rights reserved.

The information in this web site is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment.
Consultation with your doctor or health care professional is recommended.