Internet Stroke Center Home Stroke Trials Registry
 
National Institute of Neurological Disorders & Stroke
American Stroke Association
Washington University School of Medicine
 
 Trials Directories
Ongoing Trials
Completed Trials
Acute Stroke Trials
Hemorrhage Trials
Prevention Trials
Recovery Trials
 Interventions
Drugs - By Name
Drugs - By Category
Procedures
Recovery Therapies
 Assessment Scales
Specific Stroke Scales
Stroke Scales Overview
 Stroke Trial Links
Government Sites
Independent Sites
 News & Updates
Update List
General Stroke News
About this Site
Submit Your Trial
Send Feedback

 Search for Trials

PubMed
We comply with the "Health on the Net" (HON) code of standards for trustworthy health information: verify here.



 
Stroke Interventions in Clinical Trials
Printable Version
A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients



Principal Investigator
C.G. Mansur, MD & F. Fregni, MD, PhD

PI Address
Harvard Center for Non-invasive Brain Stimulation
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
330 Brookline Avenue, KS 433
Boston, MA 02215

Sponsor



Study Size Actual:16
Centers Actual:1
Max Time from onset:12 Months
Max Age:73
Min Age:28
Status:
Trial complete. Results published in May 2005.

Purpose:
To investigate the efficacy of slow-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the unaffected hemisphere in decreasing interhemispheric inhibition of the lesioned hemisphere and improving motor function in stroke patients.

Interventions:
Electrical stimulation
This category includes any form of electrical stimulation intended to improve motor function or pain after stroke.

Location(s):
Boston, MA & Brazil.

Year Finished: 2004
Year Published: 2005


Design:
Crossover, sham, stimulation-controlled, double-blind study.

Inclusion Criteria
Written consent.

Patient Involvement:
Participants received three sessions of rTMS (1 Hz, 100% of motor threshold, 600 pulses) to the unaffected hemisphere over the primary motor (real or sham rTMS) and over the premotor cortex (real rTMS). The sessions were randomized and counterbalanced across participants and each session separated by 1 hour to minimize carryover effects.

Primary Outcome:
The following tests were run to evaluate the motor function of the affected hand: 1) simple reaction time (sRT), 2) four-choice reaction time (cRT), 3) Purdue Pegboard Test, and 4) finger tapping. Each patient was tested at baseline and after sham, motor, and premotor rTMS.

Results:
Patients showed a significant decrease in simple and choice reaction time, sRT (p = 0.043) and cRT (p = 0.045) and improved performance of the Purdue Pegboard test with their affected hand after rTMS of the motor cortex in the intact hemisphere (6.2 +/- 2.9; p = 0.006) as compared with sham rTMS condition (4.2 +/- 2.4; p = 0.002). For the finger tapping test, there was no main effect of the rTMS condition on the finger-tapping test (p = 0.76) and while performance tended to be better after real motor rTMS when compared with sham stimulation, this effect was small (<5%) and variable.

Source of Information:
Neurology. 2005 May 24;64(10):1802-4.

Web Links and Publications:
A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients.
Neurology. 2005 May 24;64(10):1802-4.

This information last updated on: 8/19/2005

UID: 629

   

Internet Stroke Center at Washington University:
HOME | ABOUT | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT

Copyright © 1997-2009 - Internet Stroke Center. All rights reserved.                                           Last modified: Friday, November 20, 2009